Canopy Cover

The following are studies detailing urban canopy cover:

Tree Canopy Studies & Municipal Tree Regulations, Fulcher, Orcutt, Rittman, & Powers, Practicum Project,  UW, June 2012

Puget Sound Urban Tree Canopy and Stormwater Retention -2019

Atlanta, GA – 36.8% canopy*

Annapolis, MD – 44.9% – 2006 – Capital Gazette

Baltimore, MD – 21.0% canopy*

Bellevue, WA – 36% canopyUrban Ecosystem Analysis – Oct 2008

Bonny Lake, WA – 43% canopy – Urban Tree Canopy Assessment – 2012

Bothell, WA45% Canopy – An Assessment of Urban Tree Canopy in the City of Bothell, WA March 2016

Boston, MA – 22.3% canopy*

Calgary, Canada – 7.2% canopy*

Denver, CO – 19.7% – Urban Tree Assessment for the City of Denver 2013

Freehold, NJ – 34.4% canopy* 

Grand Rapids, MI – 34% canopyAn Assessmeny of Urban Tree Canopy in Grand Rapids, Michigan 2015

Jersey City, NJ – 11.5% canopy*

Kirkland, WA – 40.7% canopyUrban Tree Canopy Assessment Report – June 2011

Lake Forest Park, WA – 45% canopyI-Tree Ecosystem Analysis – April 2011

Minneapolis, MN – 26.5% canopy*

Moorestown, NJ – 28.0% canopy*

Morgantown, WV – 35.9% canopy*

Nashville, TN47% canopy – Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County Tree Canopy Study, April 2010

New York, NY – 21.0% canopy*

Peniscola, FL -29% canopy – Urban Tree Canopy Study Sept 2014

Philadelphia, PA – 15.7% canopy*

Port Angeles, WA 27% canopy – Urban Tree Canopy Assessment 2012

Redmond, WA –  38% tree canopy – City of Redmond Tree Canopy  – 2016

Renton, WA – 28.6 % canopy –  Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Report – July 2011

Sammamish, WA – 46% canopy – Urban Tree Canopy Assessment – 2012

South King County Canopy Study – WA -2017

San Diego13% canopy – Urban Forestry Program – 2016

San Francisco, CA DATA SF -13.7%

Seattle, WA – 22.9% canopyTree Canopy Cover Assessment– May 2009

Seattle, WA – 28% canopy – 2016 Seattle Tree Canopy Assessment – Executive Summary

Slide Presentation – Seattle LIDAR Canopy Cover Assessment – May 8, 2017

Shoreline, WA – 30.6% canopy Urban Tree Canopy Assessment – March 2011

Snoqualmie, WA – 44% canopy – Urban Tree Canopy Assessment – 2012

Syracuse, NY – 23.1% canopy*

Tacoma, WA – 19% canopy (goal 30% by 2030) – Canopy Cover – 2009

Tukwila, WA – 35% canopy- Urban Tree Canopy Assessment – Dec 2012

Toronto, Canada – 26.6% – 28% canopy (goal 40%) – Actions to Grow Toronto’s Tree Canopy – 2016

Vancouver, BC – 18% canopyUrban Forest Strategy – April 15, 2014

Vancouver, WA – 18.6% canopyUrban Tree Canopy Assessment – Sept 2011

Washington, DC – 28.1% I-Tree Ecosystem Analysis – Jan 2010

Woodbridge, NJ – 29.5% canopy*

Woodinville, WA  – 45% canopyUrban Tree Canopy Assessment – 2019

 

* from table in I-Tree Ecosystem Analysis WASHINGTON Jan. 2010

 


Leave a Reply