Canopy Cover

The following are studies detailing urban canopy cover:

Tree Canopy Studies & Municipal Tree Regulations, Fulcher, Orcutt, Rittman, & Powers, Practicum Project,  UW, June 2012

 

Atlanta, GA – 36.8% canopy*

Baltimore, MD – 21.0% canopy*

Bellevue, WA – 36% canopyUrban Ecosystem Analysis – Oct 2008

Boston, MA – 22.3% canopy*

Calgary, Canada – 7.2% canopy*

Denver, CO – 19.7% Denver Parks & Recreation

Freehold, NJ – 34.4% canopy*

Jersey City, NJ – 11.5% canopy*

Kirkland, WA – 40.7% canopyUrban Tree Canopy Assessment Report – June 2011

Lake Forest Park, WA – 45% canopyI-Tree Ecosystem Analysis – April 2011

Minneapolis, MN – 26.5% canopy*

Moorestown, NJ – 28.0% canopy*

Morgantown, WV – 35.9% canopy*

Nashville, TN47% canopy – Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County Tree Canopy Study, April 2010

New York, NY – 21.0% canopy*

Philadelphia, PA – 15.7% canopy*

Redmond, WA –  2016

Renton, WA – 28.6 % canopy –  Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Report – July 2011

Seattle, WA – 22.9% canopyUrban Tree Canopy Analysis – May 2009

Shoreline, WA – 30.6% canopy Urban Tree Canopy Assessment – March 2011

Syracuse, NY – 23.1% canopy*

Toronto, Canada – 20.5% canopy*

Vancouver, BC – 18% canopyUrban Forest Strategy – April 15, 2014

Vancouver, WA – 18.6% canopyUrban Tree Canopy Assessment – Sept 2011

Washington, DC – 28.1% I-Tree Ecosystem Analysis – Jan 2010

Woodbridge, NJ – 29.5% canopy*

 

* from table in I-Tree Ecosystem Analysis WASHINGTON

 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *